LAST CHANGED : 2021/12/08 00:27:23 CRUISE NAME(S) : km2118, hot334 CRUISE DATES : 2021/12/02 to 2021/12/07 SHIP NAME : Kilo Moana PORTS : Honolulu, HI to Honolulu, HI CHIEF SCIENTIST : Karin Björkman DATABASE NAME : a_km DATA FILES : km2021_335_68882.raw to km2021_341_00000.raw STATUS : to do done ------ ----------- averaged [ x ] loaded [ x ] NOTE: heading correction instrument exists NOTE: time-dependent heading corrections applied IN the ensembles (see cal/rotate/ens_hcorr.ang) check heading correction [ x ] calibration [ x ] edited [ x ] re-check heading correction [ x ] check editing [ x ] figures [ x ] INSTRUMENT : wh300 ACQUISITION : PROGRAM : uhdas PROCESSING: : python LOGGING : PARAMETERS : BT : bottom track mode (on or off) SI : sampling interval or averaging period for ensemble (sec) NB : number of bins BL : bin length (m) TD : transducer depth (m) BK : blanking length (m) HO : heading offset applied by DAS (deg) HB : heading bias (deg) CRPH : compensation for roll-pitch-heading, 1:on, 0:off) yy/mm/dd hh:mm:ss BT SI NB BL TD BK HO HB CRPH 2021/12/02 19:10:03 off 120 70 2 7 2 45.45 0.00 0001 HEADING : PRIMARY : heading from gyro CORRECTION : heading correction from posmv NOTE: time-dependent heading corrections applied IN the ensembles (see cal/rotate/ens_hcorr.ang) POSITIONS : gps positions from posmv CALIBRATION : (check original processing parameters) additional rotation -0.113 final transducer angle is: 45.563 (original transducer angle) - (rotate_angle) 45.45 - (-0.124) - (-0.012) - 0.023 = 45.563 applied scale factor 1.006 additional scale factor (none) COMMENTS : gaps in heading correction? One small one at beginning of cruise, ignored it. scattering layers? No bubbles? Yes, rough weather in this cruise. Upper water column data ugly. underway bias? Minimal PROCESSOR : T. Rohrer --- processing parameters ---------- ## (determined from "sonar"): model = wh ## (determined from "sonar"): frequency = 300 ## (determined from "sonar"): instname = wh300 ## (determined from "sonar"): pingtype = bb beamangle 20 cruisename km2118 datatype uhdas ens_len 120 fixfile a_km.gps frequency 300 hcorr_inst posmv instname wh300 model wh pingtype bb proc_engine python ref_method refsm refuv_smoothwin 3 refuv_source nav sonar wh300 txy_file a_km.agt xducer_dx -2 xducer_dy 1 yearbase 2021 (unless otherwise stated, comments are relative to root processing directory) codaspy:(wh300)$ =================================== (0) remake all the plots quick_mplplots.py --plots2run all --yearbase 2021 (1) look at heading correction: are there gaps? figview.py cal/rotate/*png [] There were no gaps! [X] There WERE some gaps! One gap right at beginning of cruise. I'm just going to delete that data. Did NOT run patch_hcorr.py. (2) see what calibration looks like: amp in [0.995, 1.005] : good enough to proceed to the next step. tweak later phase in (-.5, .5) : good enough to proceed to the next step. tweak later rule of thumb: errors when underway: scale factor of 1.02 (i.e. 2%) gives 10cm/s alongtrack error phase error of 1deg gives 10cm crosstrack error (goal is 1cm/s) Number of edited points: 16 out of 16 amp = 0.9997 + 0.0004 (t - 338.3) phase = -0.06 + -0.0912 (t - 338.3) median mean std amplitude 1.0045 0.9997 0.0149 phase -0.1110 -0.0611 0.5077 nav - pc -1.0000 -0.8125 1.5586 var 0.0010 0.0009 0.0009 min var 0.0010 0.0008 0.0009 delta-u -0.7200 -0.3737 3.4778 delta-v 0.1650 -0.3206 3.0367 Good enough to do edits first. (3) edit: gautoedit.py from gautoedit, for every screen do - mark seabed if necessary - additional manual editing if necessary - apply edits (creates/appends new a*.asc files with new flags) Minor edits. (4) apply editing quick_adcp.py --steps2rerun apply_edit:navsteps:calib --proc_engine python --datatype uhdas --auto (if you don't want to sit and hit y for all questions, add "yes | " before the command (no quotes)) Number of edited points: 15 out of 16 amp = 1.0025 + 0.0001 (t - 338.3) phase = -0.01 + -0.0906 (t - 338.3) median mean std amplitude 1.0060 1.0025 0.0117 phase -0.1240 -0.0074 0.4823 nav - pc 0.0000 -0.3333 1.3973 var 0.0010 0.0007 0.0007 min var 0.0010 0.0006 0.0006 delta-u -0.7100 -0.1660 3.4944 delta-v 0.2100 -0.3507 3.1415 Tweak it! quick_adcp.py --steps2rerun rotate:apply_edit:navsteps:calib --rotate_amplitude 1.006 --rotate_angle -0.124 --auto Number of edited points: 16 out of 17 amp = 0.9987 + -0.0009 (t - 338.2) phase = -0.08 + 0.0101 (t - 338.2) median mean std amplitude 1.0005 0.9987 0.0139 phase -0.0120 -0.0791 0.9147 nav - pc 0.0000 0.1250 1.3601 var 0.0010 0.0009 0.0008 min var 0.0010 0.0008 0.0007 delta-u -0.7300 -0.2544 3.3944 delta-v 0.2400 -0.2519 3.0606 (5) apply calibration correct to third sig fig for amplitude; second for phase if both are positive values, enter a positive correction Try fixing the phase. quick_adcp.py --steps2rerun rotate:apply_edit:navsteps:calib --rotate_amplitude 1.00 --rotate_angle -0.012 --auto Number of edited points: 15 out of 17 amp = 0.9966 + 0.0001 (t - 338.3) phase = 0.13 + -0.0901 (t - 338.3) median mean std amplitude 1.0000 0.9966 0.0118 phase 0.0230 0.1315 0.4830 nav - pc 0.0000 -0.1333 0.9155 var 0.0010 0.0008 0.0006 min var 0.0010 0.0008 0.0006 delta-u -0.7100 -0.1660 3.4944 delta-v 0.2100 -0.3507 3.1415 Made it WORSE. WTF? quick_adcp.py --steps2rerun rotate:apply_edit:navsteps:calib --rotate_amplitude 1.00 --rotate_angle 0.023 --auto Number of edited points: 16 out of 17 amp = 0.9987 + -0.0009 (t - 338.2) phase = -0.09 + 0.0092 (t - 338.2) median mean std amplitude 1.0005 0.9987 0.0141 phase -0.0120 -0.0882 0.9112 nav - pc 0.0000 0.1250 1.3601 var 0.0010 0.0009 0.0008 min var 0.0010 0.0008 0.0007 delta-u -0.7300 -0.2544 3.3944 delta-v 0.2400 -0.2519 3.0606 Back to where it was. Guess I'm going to leave well enough alone. (6) web plots: quick_web.py --interactive cd ../ cat wh300/cruise_info.txt dm_notes_wh300.txt > wh300.txt ALL done